Skip to main content

Not Love is Not Love

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen

While browsing social media, I came across the hash tag, "love is love", which was used in reference to homosexual relationships. This is nothing in which rational people can take pride. People hijacked the word "gay" as well as the rainbow (which they perverted for their own style), and are in open rebellion against God — their behavior is also unnatural. While it is irrational for atheists to wrap their identities in their rebellion against the God they pretend does not exist, it seems even more irrational for people to seek their identities in how they use their genitalia. It's mighty simplistic to write it all off as "love is love".

People are using the term "love is love". This is simplistic nonsense. We can take it to its logical conclusion.

As we have seen in the news and on the web, ever since the US Supreme Court redefined "marriage" to include same-sex relationships, there has been an increase in other deviant groups who want their sexual preferences recognized, accepted, and even celebrated. Those of us who believe in God's standards are called "haters", "homophobes" (a nonsense term, I don't phobe any homos), and other terms to provoke negative emotions. Such people indulge in bigotry while claiming to be victims, but they cannot change the truth of God's Word. You may want to read (or download the audio version) "A Journey from a Homosexual Lifestyle to Christ".

Let's see if my efforts to take "love is love" to its logical conclusion are successful:
  • A woman wants to marry a tree, and it meets her emotional and sexual needs. Love is love, even with a plant.
  • A woman married herself, and then "cheated" on her vows. Love is love, even when done solo — and then someone else joins in.
  • Pedophiles want to be called "Minor Attracted Persons" (normal people refer to this sexual abuse of children), and want to be included under the LGBT umbrella. Love is love, right, little Johnny?
  • There are reports of those who want sex with animals to have acceptance. (Do your own research, I don't want to include links; I even saw but refused to follow links to gay porn with animals.) Love is love, even with the horse you rode in on.
  • Can't forget the folks who want polyamory and polygamy, can we? Love is love is love is love (stop me when all of your "significant others" are covered) is love is love...
I lack belief that these people have real knowledge about the meaning of love. That is a gift of God, and he established how it must be used.

There are apostate "Christians" who want to be "inclusive" under the facade of "love", allowing homosexual relationships and other deviant behaviors. You're not showing God's love or truth, you're enabling them, you savvy? Not too long ago, someone wrote for the New York Times an article with false accusations about the book of Leviticus. I have two links for you about that. First, this video by Dr. James White which starts at 49 minutes, 45 seconds. Second, an insightful article by Dr. Albert Mohler, "Leviticus in The New York Times: What’s the Real Story Here?"

Love is love? Not a chance. These things have nothing to do with love.

Lust is lust. Mental illness is mental illness. Perversion is perversion. Stupid is stupid. Sin is sin. These people need to repent. There is true love, forgiveness, and acceptance in Jesus Christ. God is love, and he has made himself known in his Word.


Popular posts from this blog

Shining the Light on a Darwinist Deceiver

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen This is part 2 of Conspiracy Theories, Creation, and Reason , but takes a different approach. We saw how a number of factors contribute to the act of purveying conspiracy theories, and how there are several reasons why people believe them. Then there is the alleged creation science conspiracy. Credit: Unsplash / Steve Johnson We have three articles to consider, two of which are from the same ministry. Naturally there will be some overlap, but they each offer material that comprise a larger picture. There was a time when if someone had a question about, say, that 2002 email saying the teddy bear icon in Windows was really a virus. They could check Snopes and find out that it was a hoax , and they could search for urban legends. Unfortunately, they became heavily involved in promoting leftist political views with "fact checking", and their credibility became questionable. Snopes even attacked the parody site Babylon Bee (one of whose slogans is " fa

Smoking that Doobie, Brother

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen Many countries, especially on the western side of the Atlantic, have decriminalized cannabis (weed, pot, doobies, grass, smoke, reefer, whatever) and legalized it for medical use. Many places have made recreational use legal as well. Even where illegal, enforcement of laws is often sporadic . And there was great rejoicing among pot smokers. In fact, here in not-all-that-far-upstate New York, cops don't care. Polly Pothead in the apartment next door was chugging away so much, the smoke could be seen not only in the hallway, but seeped into our own apartment. Police did nothing. That was before it was legal, but her usage is the same as before; smoking wacky tobaccy just wasn't important enough to enforce the law. Also, she's a terrible conversationalist. One article I found in my research mentioned that Mary Jane was originally illegal because it is harmful. (Oh, come on! Don't get a burr under your saddle. You know it's true. People who argue

Silencing President Trump and Me

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen This article is going to cover a few shocking points that should be of concern to people who value free speech. Donald Trump and I are best buddies — yeah, like he knows that I even exist. But we do have a few things in common regarding censorship. Made at PhotoFunia I was riding the Fakebook trail one night in March of 2013 when I was suddenly booted. Huh? They demanded proof of my age! After complying, I was told,  Upon investigation, we have determined that you are ineligible to use Facebook. You can view our Statement of Rights and Responsibilities at the following address: https://www.facebook.com/terms.php Unfortunately, for safety and security reasons, we cannot provide additional information as to why your account was disabled. This decision is final. Thanks for your understanding Security reasons? Oh, please! Upon searching, this has happened to other people as well. They did not receive explanations or reinstatement, either. I thought it was a fluke,