Skip to main content

Who is it For?

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen

As much as I dislike titles that are in the form of a question (there always seems to be some jasper who has an "answer" and feels no need to read the material before commenting), this is vague enough to cause curiosity. Every once in a while, I notice people who are fond of keeping with the latest trends, many of those are related to fashion.

Many people feel compelled to follow the trends. This may involve investing a great deal of time and money, but trends change frequently. Some slang terms only lasted a few years and will cause a user to be scorned by the trendy. (I use some to be humorous or individual.) Who are they dressing, getting hairstyles, speaking, listening to certain music, etc., for?

There are people who get caught up in trends with fashions and such. Do you wonder why they do these things? One possible answer may shock you.
Paris Fashions in Peterson's Magazine, February 1871 —
these were being sold about the time Charles Darwin's
The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex was published
It is my view that people seek attention and approval when they do these things (Oscar Wilde said, "There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about.") Some mavericks do not care a whit about fashion and getting the approval of others, and I reckon they have a sense of freedom. Don't be disunderstanding me, though. There are times and places where it is useful (possibly required) to dress appropriately. Keep it in balance!

Have you ever seen photos of or watched a fashion show? It seems those dreadful things are marketed to elite wealthy women, so the public doesn't have to endure those products in the real world. That is a small blessing. Elite women may say, "Why yes, I have an original by..." I don't care.

Men are not exempt, but there seems to be less fashion pressure. How about fragrance? It wasn't until very recently that I learned that a man should have not only a "signature scent," but there are colognes for each season. I was given an all-season cologne for Christmas, but I usually just slap on some basic after shave and get on with doing creationist stuff.

There is no scientific, psychological, or sociological theory for you here. In fact, this part may seem like a contradiction: People want and seem to need the approval of spouses, friends, supervisors, church leaders, and so on. That kind is more in keeping with spiritual and moral values, not how we look. The main thing I want to point out is that seeking the attention and approval of others seems rooted in pride. Christian, who do you want to please most of all?

I'm wearing a nice shirt and a bolo tie for my own pleasure and also to please my wife, and mayhaps some co-workers may like it. Or they may not notice. It's how we emphasize adornment that can be a problem. The Bible does not forbid it. Women are admonished to dress modestly (2 Tim. 2:9-10, 2 Peter 3:3-5), showing good works and character representing life in Christ.

Yes, I used quite a few vague words and sound like an evolutionary scientist because I am not insisting that what I write is some great insight. I could be wrong. Even so, I hope it gave all y'all something to think about. Then go further and think about what you do for the approval of others when it is unnecessary, and possibly based on pride.

Popular posts from this blog

Scary Videos and Foolish People

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen There are several channels on YouTube that offer scary videos, many of which are allegedly of paranormal occurrences. I get both entertainment and educational value from these. I wonder if they are compelling, faked, or people are receiving pranks. One from Nuke's Top 5  illustrates the foolishness of going into "abandoned" places. Original photo of Eastern State Penitentiary from the Library of Congress , art effect from FotoSketcher (Usage does not imply endorsement of site contents by parties named above) First of all, places are often called abandoned  when they are in ruins and there is no sign of activity, but they are seldom truly abandoned. Sometimes Eastern State Penitentiary is said to be abandoned, but it has always belonged to someone. In fact, it is a historical landmark and has tours. Interestingly, they have a "haunted house" time, but the penitentiary has been visited by various ghost seekers because it has a rep

Why that Atheist Hates Me: Asteroid Mining

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen  Professing atheists are known for attacking Christians — especially biblical creationists (it's who they are and what they do), but seldom go after other religions. There are always people who believe things that we reject, but to seek those people out and and subject them to vituperation is petty and emotionally immature. God calls atheists fools  (Psalm 14:1), the Hebrew word is nabal (נָבָל) and denotes morally wicked, not necessarily stupid. However, since sin ruins everything it touches, many allegedly smart atheists are incapable of reason. Let me tell you about a couple of them, one in particular. Artist's conception of Trojan asteroids /  NASA / JPL-Caltech (usage does not imply endorsement of site contents) When working for Stroid Mining ( stroid  is a compression of asteroid ), our base was Marvin, on Mars. Sorta. While there wasn't a space station, we did have some big ships. They had science analysis stations to determine which stroids

Four-Legged Snake in the News Again

Writing about sciency things can be both fascinating and exasperating. The fascinating part is for those of us who like science, but the exasperating part is doing updates. New discoveries are a part of science, especially regarding origins. Darwin's disciples are continually attempting to rewrite history to accommodate observed evidence and still preserve their narrative of atheistic naturalism. Excitement over a supposed four-legged snake fossil slithered back ( which I posted about earlier ) and disputes continue. Tetrapodophis amplectus , Wikimedia Commons / Ghedoghedo  ( CC BY-SA 4.0 ) This whole thing was sensationalized from the get-go to promote fish-to-fool evolution and millions of years. Indeed, some important facts about the fossil were not even discussed. It "sheds light" on evolution. Secularists think it would be (insert mouth click here like Cousin Eddie) really nice, but they still have nothing upon which to base that claim. Mayhaps if they realized that