Skip to main content

Why that Atheist Hates Me: Asteroid Mining

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen 

Professing atheists are known for attacking Christians — especially biblical creationists (it's who they are and what they do), but seldom go after other religions. There are always people who believe things that we reject, but to seek those people out and and subject them to vituperation is petty and emotionally immature.

God calls atheists fools (Psalm 14:1), the Hebrew word is nabal (נָבָל) and denotes morally wicked, not necessarily stupid. However, since sin ruins everything it touches, many allegedly smart atheists are incapable of reason. Let me tell you about a couple of them, one in particular.

Atheists often have trouble leaving people alone. Some pretend to have excuses for their hatred of God and Christians. His began mining asteroids.
Artist's conception of Trojan asteroids / NASA / JPL-Caltech (usage does not imply endorsement of site contents)
When working for Stroid Mining (stroid is a compression of asteroid), our base was Marvin, on Mars. Sorta. While there wasn't a space station, we did have some big ships. They had science analysis stations to determine which stroids had any worthwhile amounts of interesting materials. The ships held our single-pilot flitters and a dozen of us would launch from there. Fire a few bolts at the asteroids, grapple the good rocks, and haul them back to the cargo hold. Lather, rinse, repeat.

Pretty good firepower, too. We could stay out for several hours, each pilot had a sector (I guess quadrant was too Trekkish), and fire three bursts per second and break down or cut into the asteroids. Can't get too close because the kinetic energy changes their course, often accelerating them. Sometimes right back at us. I thanked God for whoever designed the energy shields.

Cutting costs, Stroid Mining found a way to turn our flitters into drones and we would operate them by remote control. Sure, why not? Besides, the main asteroid belt is not like we see in science fiction movies; the big stuff is widely separated. There are exceptions — especially when they are caused.

At the end of my shift, my supervisor messaged that she needed to see me. Blinking from the eye strain, I got up from my chair, adjusted my hat, stretched, and headed to her office.

"Whatcha got, Zoe?"

"Cowboy Bob, I know you tendered your resignation and you're done in another week, but something's come up and Stroid Mining would like you to stay on."

This was not something I was in any frame of mind to discuss. "Look, I already ordered my own flitter so I could do my own mining. Marvin base over yonder on Mars is open to everyone that pays, and —"

'I know and I'm sorry", she said, giving me the big blue eyes treatment. "The company will make it worth your while."

"You laid off a passel of pilots, but I believe they're still on Marvin."

Zoe sighed. "Yes, I know. This isn't just a need for operators, though. We need your particular skill set."

I looked at her and waited.

"You're a good flyer," she continued. "One of the best we ever had. A great shot." Zoe sighed again. "But some explosions showed up on radar."

"Explosions?" I asked incredulously. "How?"

"We don't think we're alone out here, and there's reason to think the, uh, other party is unfriendly."

Popular posts from this blog

The Secular Science Industry Propagandizes Same-Sex Attraction

We are told that the peer review process in the secular science industry is a method of providing truth and accuracy, and ensuring correct procedures were followed in submitted papers. That sounds like a mighty good idea, but peer-reviewed papers are often bad,  downright fraudulent, or hoaxes . Homosexual activists passed a peer-reviewed paper in  Science  magazine, but that should not have happened. It was fake science research, and  Science  was embarrassed by the fraudulent tactics. The secular science industry did not seem to learn from this. Assembled with images from Open Clipart After the Science  humiliation and the "We're so sorry if we've caused you any pain, Uncle Albert, and boy, does this hurt the credibility of science itself in the public eye" schtick, the disastrous Obergefell decision by the US Supreme Court struck. (That is one reason I believe we're under divine Judgment .) After that ruling, the militant Gaystapo cut loose with harassing peopl

Smoking that Doobie, Brother

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen Many countries, especially on the western side of the Atlantic, have decriminalized cannabis (weed, pot, doobies, grass, smoke, reefer, whatever) and legalized it for medical use. Many places have made recreational use legal as well. Even where illegal, enforcement of laws is often sporadic . And there was great rejoicing among pot smokers. In fact, here in not-all-that-far-upstate New York, cops don't care. Polly Pothead in the apartment next door was chugging away so much, the smoke could be seen not only in the hallway, but seeped into our own apartment. Police did nothing. That was before it was legal, but her usage is the same as before; smoking wacky tobaccy just wasn't important enough to enforce the law. Also, she's a terrible conversationalist. One article I found in my research mentioned that Mary Jane was originally illegal because it is harmful. (Oh, come on! Don't get a burr under your saddle. You know it's true. People who argue

Four-Legged Snake in the News Again

Writing about sciency things can be both fascinating and exasperating. The fascinating part is for those of us who like science, but the exasperating part is doing updates. New discoveries are a part of science, especially regarding origins. Darwin's disciples are continually attempting to rewrite history to accommodate observed evidence and still preserve their narrative of atheistic naturalism. Excitement over a supposed four-legged snake fossil slithered back ( which I posted about earlier ) and disputes continue. Tetrapodophis amplectus , Wikimedia Commons / Ghedoghedo  ( CC BY-SA 4.0 ) This whole thing was sensationalized from the get-go to promote fish-to-fool evolution and millions of years. Indeed, some important facts about the fossil were not even discussed. It "sheds light" on evolution. Secularists think it would be (insert mouth click here like Cousin Eddie) really nice, but they still have nothing upon which to base that claim. Mayhaps if they realized that